Executing From the Bench

The Moore-ons frequently complain about judicial tyranny. It is undemocratic, they say, for a judge to prohibit prayer in schools, or to forbid executing children. If the people want to acknowledge god, or put twelve year olds to death, no judge can prohibit them.

I won’t criticize that argument here. I only ask how it applies to Alabama’s capital sentencing scheme. As pointed out in this article, in Alabama death penalty cases the jury makes a sentencing recommendation, which the judge is free to accept or reject. According to the article, in about one quarter of death sentences the judge rejected a life recommendation. In other words, the judge sentenced the defendant to death even though a group of twelve ordinary citizens who heard the same evidence as did the judge decided that life was the appropriate sentence.

Judicial tyranny? If not, how is entrusting a judge to overide a jury’s sentence different than entrusting a judge to declare laws unconstitutional?

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: